CONCEPT OF ANTISYSTEM IN THE STUDY OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC REFORMS OUTPUT

The new economic reality established in the modern world forces researchers to attend to a very promising for the science accustomed to the precise boundaries of disciplinary research problem of finding new opportunities for the development of the economic theory, sufficient to reveal qualitatively new phenomena caused by the interaction of transformation processes of different nature. At the same time, the interdisciplinary approach aimed at combining and intertwining resources of various research areas and consequently, at synergistic effects, is naturally the focus of attention. One of the most popular interdisciplinary opportunities in this case is the concept of antisystem, formed in social-historical and ethnological research areas. Antisystems as the results of social and economic transformations arise on the basis of setting, social acceptance and implementation of transformation goals, negative for the development of the society as a whole; long-term functioning of such system formations leads to useless waste of social resources, formation of many destructive for the functions and structure of the social and economic system products, destabilization of social and economic communications and actual suspension of the evolutionary process. Antisystems implement a certain set of ideas negative in terms of the evolutionary approach which for some reasons received a temporary recognition of society as a whole or some part of it; in this respect, antisystems act as the results of negative strategizing of the development of social and economic relations. Accordingly, the destruction of antisystems involves a multi-stage social denial and debunking of this idea-complex, which burdens social development with additional costs of profound and large-scale transformations. The polarization of modern Russian society creates conditions for the lack of demand and reduction of the subject potential of many of its participants, which in its turn ensures the formation and "silent" raise social and economic transformations of ideological constructs that do not stand up to scientific criticism and are destructive for social and economic practice to the rank of goals. In particular, the noncritical borrowing of foreign institutional forms and the consequent bureaucratization of the sphere of education and science of modern Russia conditioned the formation of an antisystem in this sphere, many of the results of its functioning contribute to deepening the crisis situation in the national economy and reduce to nothing the achievements in the sphere of education and science obtained in previous years.