z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Insisting on victory
Author(s) -
Mustafa Coşar Ünal,
Petra Cafnik Uludağ
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
revista científica general josé maría córdova/revista científica general josé maría córdova
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2500-7645
pISSN - 1900-6586
DOI - 10.21830/19006586.522
Subject(s) - victory , adversary , decisive victory , politics , political science , outcome (game theory) , political economy , law , sociology , computer security , computer science , economics , mathematical economics
In a COIN campaign, using the term victory, a military defeat of the enemy –in its classical definition– is highly problematic. A review of the Turkey-PKK conflict reveals that after Turkey’s pursuit of a unilateral military victory, the PKK pursued a broader socio-political campaign by relying on asymmetric warfare and indirectness in combat. Military victory did not successfully end the conflict; it only changed its nature. Therefore, we suggest that success is a better concept to assess states’ counterinsurgency campaigns. It focuses on political solutions and shifts perception from one-sided victory to a favorable outcome for all parties involved. Lastly, referring to the completed phases as a success offers better accuracy because the outcome in COIN is not merely a victory or a defeat.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here