z-logo
Premium
A Systematic Review of Critical Thinking Instruments for Use in Dental Education
Author(s) -
Anders Patrick L.,
Stellrecht Elizabeth M.,
Davis Elaine L.,
McCall W.D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.21815/jde.019.043
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , grey literature , critical thinking , dental education , medical education , data extraction , psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , medline , subject (documents) , medicine , applied psychology , clinical psychology , pedagogy , computer science , library science , political science , paleontology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , law , biology
Critical thinking is widely recognized as an essential competency in dental education, but there is little agreement on how it should be assessed. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the availability of instruments that could be used to measure critical thinking in dental students and to evaluate psychometric evidence to support their use. In January 2017, an electronic search of both the medical and education literature was performed on nine databases. The search included both keyword and Medical Subject Heading terms for critical thinking, higher education/health sciences education, measurement/assessment, and reproducibility of results. The grey literature was included in the search. The search produced 2,977 unique records. From the title and abstract review, 183 articles were selected for further review, which resulted in 36 articles for data extraction. Ten of these studies sought to evaluate psychometric properties of the instruments used and were subjected to quality assessment. Seven assessment instruments were identified. Of these, three instruments that have not been widely used nor tested in health professions students showed evidence of psychometric strength and appeared to have potential for use in dental education. Further research should focus on the three critical thinking instruments with strong psychometric evidence, with the aim of establishing validity and reliability in the context of dental education.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here