Premium
Analyzing Dental Students’ Clinic Production Using Time‐Based Relative Value Units: Ten‐Year Cross‐Cohort Mapping
Author(s) -
Watkins R. Todd,
Conn Linc J.,
Gellin Robert G.,
Gonzales Theresa S.,
Hamil Lindsey M.,
Cayouette Monica J.,
Schmidt Michael G.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of dental education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1930-7837
pISSN - 0022-0337
DOI - 10.21815/jde.018.025
Subject(s) - subspecialty , medicine , cohort , curriculum , cohort study , dentistry , prosthodontics , educational measurement , medical education , medical physics , family medicine , psychology , pathology , pedagogy
The analysis of dental students’ clinical production/participation has been used to assess whether a prospective graduate is capable of unsupervised and independent practice (that is, competent to perform that practice). This method and others have inherent biases that may not accurately reflect whether the student has mastered the associated concepts and techniques required for dentistry. The aim of this study was to assess an informatics system that assigned curriculum meta‐tags with time‐based relative educational value units (ReVUs) to each clinical procedure performed by Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) students. The system has been used since 1998, but for this study the complete data sets for the MUSC graduating classes of 2007 through 2016 were mapped using microcompetency codes for the dental procedures. In total, 421,494 procedures were formatted and analyzed using software developed to aggregate disparate data sets from clinical activities into a common format for evaluation. The results showed that the ten classes (cohorts) were very consistent with cohort high ReVUs averaging 7,317.1 points, cohort mean ReVUs being 5,180.2 points, and cohort low ReVUs averaging 3,381 points. A detailed analysis of student effort by dental subspecialty found that preventive activities represented 13.4%, patient assessment 32.6%, periodontology 2.8%, restorative dentistry 16.3%, prosthodontics 21.9%, endodontics 6.7%, and oral surgery 5.7% of the total points in the clinical part of the curriculum. In this system, point thresholds can be easily generated to monitor students’ progress towards competence for each defined competency and thus assess their progress towards acquiring the skills required for unsupervised, independent practice.