Open AccessRawls against Rawls: on the political value of social association
Author(s) -
J Le Grand
Publication year - 2023
Publication title -
ethics, politics and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2184-2582
DOI - 10.21814/eps.5.1.170
Subject(s) - freedom of association , value (mathematics) , association (psychology) , politics , argument (complex analysis) , voluntary association , liberalism , social psychology , conscience , sociology , law and economics , epistemology , political science , law , psychology , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , computer science , machine learning
This study focuses on the paradigmatic category of social association to question the general treatment of freedom of association in theories of justice. Social associations are organised, voluntary, and secondary associations that do not have any particular economic or political function and are not related to any external authority. This category is deployed to re-examine the relationship between freedom of association and the two moral powers. I support the argument that freedom of social association is not only an institutional condition for conscience, as stated by Rawls, but also has an evident direct connection with both moral powers, because they enable individuals to lead a life that they collectively affirm to be reasonable and valuable and develop a sense of value and confidence in their own abilities. This is the fundamental associative interest we have in self-respect, which has been rendered philosophically invisible in political liberalism by the category of non-political association.