Open AccessCLASSIFICATION OF JUDGMENTS IN THE ARBITRATION PROCESS
Author(s) -
M.A. Magomedova
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
ûridičeskij vestnik dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2411-0299
pISSN - 2224-0241
DOI - 10.21779/2224-0241-2021-37-1-84-89
Subject(s) - lawmaking , arbitration , legislation , political science , interim , normative , law , judicial opinion , process (computing) , computer science , psychology , legislature , operating system
The article is devoted to the classification of court decisions in the arbitration process. Based on the analysis of the opinions of scientists and judicial practice, the author comes to the conclusion that court decisions can be classified into different types on the following grounds: methods of defense; procedures for making a court decision; content; the time of the proceedings in which it was made, and the completeness of the response to the stated requirements. The article analyzes the norms of arbitration procedural legislation that contain requirements for a court decision, identifies problematic issues and suggests ways to solve them. It is proposed to legalize the interim decision on certain categories of cases and in the case of consideration of the case in separate court sessions in the arbitration process and to recognize the judicial decisions on challenging normative acts as lawmaking.