z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Patient Undergoing Pericardiostomy due to Large Pericardial Effusion: A Case Report
Author(s) -
Dedy Irawan,
Sasmojo Widito,
Mohammad Saifur Rohman,
Cholid Tri Tjahjono
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
heart science journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2721-9984
pISSN - 2721-9976
DOI - 10.21776/ub.hsj.2021.002.04.9
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , surgery , pericardial effusion , conventional pci , discontinuation , stent , perioperative , partial thromboplastin time , cardiology , myocardial infarction , platelet
Background : Stent thrombosis is a serious complication following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to avoid it. Surgery, on the other hand, is a common cause for stopping DAPT. Because patients were exposed to the possibility of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) when DAPT was stopped, this circumstance poses a clinical dilemma. Objective : This case report aimed to describe the management of antithrombotic therapy in post PCI patient requiring DAPT who underwent pericardiostomy. Case : A 69-year-old woman with large pericardial effusion without cardiac tamponade, breast cancer on chemo- therapy, heart failure stage C NYHA functional class II, chronic coronary syndrome post-DES implantation at proximal-mid LAD, and hypertension. The patient underwent pericardiotomy procedures five days after DAPT discontinuation. For the bridging therapy, continuous UFH administration was initiated at a dose of 18 IU/kg/hour after the cessation of DAPT. The UFH dose was adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) 1.5 to 2.0 times the control value. The UFH was discontinued 6 hours before surgery. After surgery, UFH infusion was restarted 6 hours after the confirmation of hemostasis. The administration of UFH then continued until three days after DAPT was restarted. No complications were found during and after the pericar- diostomy. Conclusion : We reported an antithrombotic treatment strategy in a post PCI patient undergoing pericardiostomy with discontinuation of DAPT, which was successfully treated with UFH without any complication. The UFH has been widely used in perioperative settings as a bridging therapy during the interruption of DAPT and may be considered in this condition.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here