
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENANGANAN COVID-19 DARI PERSPEKTIF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE
Author(s) -
Sapto Hermawan,
Herman Herman
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
arena hukum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2527-4406
pISSN - 0126-0235
DOI - 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7
Subject(s) - jurisprudence , government (linguistics) , political science , covid-19 , presidential system , law , public administration , medicine , philosophy , linguistics , disease , pathology , politics , infectious disease (medical specialty)
As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.