Premium
A laboratory study of the bioremediation of 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene‐contaminated soil using aerobic/anoxic soil slurry reactor
Author(s) -
Boopathy Ramaraj,
Manning John,
Kulpa Charles F.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
water environment research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.356
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1554-7531
pISSN - 1061-4303
DOI - 10.2175/106143098x126919
Subject(s) - trinitrotoluene , bioremediation , anoxic waters , environmental chemistry , slurry , chemistry , soil contamination , biodegradation , population , mineralization (soil science) , human decontamination , contamination , soil water , waste management , environmental science , environmental engineering , organic chemistry , nitrogen , soil science , explosive material , ecology , demography , sociology , biology , engineering
The successful operation of an aerobic/anoxic laboratory‐scale soil slurry reactor showed that soil contaminated with 2,4,6‐trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro‐l,3,5‐trinitro‐l,3,5‐triazine (RDX) could be treated in batches or semicontinuously. Batch treatment resulted in the transformation of TNT. Semicontinuous treatment resulted in complete degradation of TNT. In addition to removing TNT, the slurry reactor also removed contaminants such as trinitrobenzene, 2,4‐dinitrotoluene, RDX, and octahydro‐l,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐l,3,5,7‐tetraazocine (HMX). Radiolabeled TNT incubated with reactor biomass showed that 23% of [ 14 C]TNT was mineralized, 27% was converted to biomass, and 8% was adsorbed onto the soil. The rest of the [ 14 C]TNT was accounted for as metabolites, including a ring cleavage product identified as 2,3‐butanediol. Increasing the frequency of soil addition from once to two or three times weekly did not affect the TNT removal rates. The soil slurry reactor also maintained the bacterial population fairly well, needing only 0.3% molasses as a cosubstrate.