Premium
Implication of Using Different Carbon Sources for Denitrification in Wastewater Treatments
Author(s) -
Cherchi Carla,
OnnisHayden Annalisa,
ElShawabkeh Ibrahim,
Gu April Z.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
water environment research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.356
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1554-7531
pISSN - 1061-4303
DOI - 10.2175/106143009x12465435982610
Subject(s) - denitrification , denitrifying bacteria , effluent , nitrate , wastewater , environmental engineering , chemistry , sewage treatment , anoxic waters , environmental chemistry , carbon fibers , nitrogen , environmental science , materials science , organic chemistry , composite number , composite material
Application of external carbon sources for denitrification becomes necessary for wastewater treatment plants that have to meet very stringent effluent nitrogen limits (e.g., 3 to 5 mgTN/L). In this study, we evaluated and compared three carbon sources—MicroC TM (Environmental Operating Solutions, Bourne, Massachusetts), methanol, and acetate—in terms of their denitrification rates and kinetics, effect on overall nitrogen removal performance, and microbial community structure of carbon‐specific denitrifying enrichments. Denitrification rates and kinetics were determined with both acclimated and non‐acclimated biomass, obtained from laboratory‐scale sequencing batch reactor systems or full‐scale plants. The results demonstrate the feasibility of the use of MicroC TM for denitrification processes, with maximum denitrification rates ( k dmax ) of 6.4 mgN/gVSS·h and an observed yield of 0.36 mgVSS/mgCOD. Comparable maximum nitrate uptake rates were found with methanol, while acetate showed a maximum denitrification rate nearly twice as high as the others. The maximum growth rates measured at 20°C for MicroC TM and methanol were 3.7 and 1.2 day −1 , respectively. The implications resulting from the differences in the denitrification rates and kinetics of different carbon sources on the full‐scale nitrogen removal performance, under various configurations and operational conditions, were assessed using Biowin (EnviroSim Associates, Ltd., Flamborough, Ontario, Canada) simulations for both pre‐ and post‐denitrification systems. Examination of microbial population structures using Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) throughout the study period showed dynamic temporal changes and distinct microbial community structures of different carbon‐specific denitrifying cultures. The ability of a specific carbon‐acclimated denitrifying population to instantly use other carbon source also was investigated, and the chemical‐structure‐associated behavior patterns observed suggested that the complex biochemical pathways/enzymes involved in the denitrification process depended on the carbon sources used.