Open AccessDemonstratives, definiteness effects and the type-token distinction
Author(s) -
Ignacio Bosque
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
linguística/linguística
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2182-9713
pISSN - 1646-6195
DOI - 10.21747/16466195/lingespa16
Subject(s) - definiteness , demonstrative , linguistics , focus (optics) , predicate (mathematical logic) , interpretation (philosophy) , computer science , security token , philosophy of language , property (philosophy) , mathematics , psychology , philosophy , epistemology , programming language , physics , metaphysics , computer security , optics
Definiteness effects have been attested in the literature for some DPs complementing HAVE (= English have and their counterparts in other languages). In this paper, which focuses on English and Spanish, demonstrative DPs are shown to be affected by the type-token distinction in HAVE contexts: the internal argument of HAVE receives a type reading in these cases and rejects a to-ken interpretation. The “type restriction on demonstrative DPs” (TRD) is shown to follow from the need for narrow focus NPs complementing HAVE to receive a hearer-new reading, a well-known property of presentational structures. Type readings of demonstrative DPs are shown to meet this condition. Apparent exceptions to the TRD effect include (i) DPs in so-called “remainder contexts”; (ii) structures in which the relevant DP is the subject of a small clause (sometimes with a non-overt predicate); and (iii) structures containing a number of anti-assertive operators. The contexts in (i) are shown to be hearer-new, in spite of being definite. Those in (ii) and (iii) provide DPs which escape the narrow focus interpretation that gives ride to this variety of the definiteness effect.