
Typological Damage Fragility Curves for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings affected by the 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake
Author(s) -
Maria Zucconi,
Rachele Ferlito,
Luigi Sorrentino
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the open civil engineering journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.249
H-Index - 16
ISSN - 1874-1495
DOI - 10.2174/1874149502115010117
Subject(s) - fragility , unreinforced masonry building , peak ground acceleration , masonry , structural engineering , roof , vulnerability (computing) , vulnerability assessment , seismic risk , engineering , computer science , civil engineering , ground motion , psychology , chemistry , computer security , psychological resilience , psychotherapist
Background: Seismic risk mitigation has become a crucial issue due to the great number of casualties and large economic losses registered after recent earthquakes. In particular, unreinforced masonry constructions built before modern seismic codes, common in Italy and in other seismic-prone areas, are characterized by great vulnerability. In order to implement mitigation policies, analytical tools are necessary to generate scenario simulations. Methods: Therefore, data collected during inspections after the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy earthquake are used to derive novel fragility functions. Compared to previous studies, data are interpreted accounting for the presence of buildings not inspected due to those being undamaged. An innovative building damage state is proposed and is based on the response of different structural elements recorded in the survey form: vertical structures, horizontal structures, stairs, roof, and partition walls. In the suggested formulation, the combination of their performance is weighted based on typical reparation techniques and on the relative size of the structural elements, estimated from a database of complete geometrical surveys developed specifically for this study. Moreover, the proposed building damage state estimates earthquake-related damage by removing the preexisting damage reported in the inspection form. Results: Lognormal fragility curves, in terms of building damage state grade as a function of typological classes and peak ground acceleration, derived maximizing their likelihood and their merits compared with previous studies are highlighted. Conclusion: The correction of the database to account for uninspected buildings delivers curves that are less “stiff” and reach the median for lower peak ground acceleration values. The building feature that influences most the fragility is the masonry quality.