
CHOOSING NORMATIVITY AFTER THE “DEATH OF GOD”. ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF WEAK THOUGHT
Author(s) -
Andrzej Kobyliński
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
studia philosophiae christianae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2720-0531
pISSN - 0585-5470
DOI - 10.21697/spch.2020.56.s2.10
Subject(s) - epistemology , metaphysics , subject (documents) , persuasion , philosophy , demise , law , political science , linguistics , library science , computer science
The article aims to analyse the concept of normativity within the philosophy of weak thought developed by Gianni Vattimo. Weak thought refers to the idea of weakening the existence in the era of metaphysical demise, as well as a challenge to the Cartesian concept of the subject. This philosophical tradition does not entirely abandon moral normativity. Vattimo proposes a weak notion of normativity, i.e. persuasion, without claims of universal applicability. Weak normativity derives from dialogue and respect for tradition, as well as recommends compliance with specific moral principles. However, it does not consider their applicability to be universal. This kind of normativity is established on the basis of cultural heritage, agreement and social contract.