z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dopuszczalność kary śmierci w ujęciu Tadeusza Ślipki. Kara śmierci rekapitulacją uprawnionej obrony
Author(s) -
Krzysztof Butowski
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
studia ecologiae et bioethicae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2719-826X
pISSN - 1733-1218
DOI - 10.21697/seb.2010.8.1.07
Subject(s) - right to life , aggression , law , state (computer science) , human life , criminology , philosophy , psychology , political science , human rights , social psychology , computer science , humanity , algorithm
The above article presents a critical analysis of a conception of limited admissibility of death penalty by Tadeusz Ślipko (restrained retention). Its essence is based on the fact that the victim of a wrongful aggressor has got the right to effectively defend his/her life. The source of such law lies in the absolute inviolability of innocent human’s life as a fundamental right of every man. In case of efficient act of aggression (cold – blooded murder), the state takes over the right to effectively defend the victim’s right of life by administering the perpetrator the death penalty (“life for life”).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here