z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A comparison of medical treatment versus surgical treatment for the management of Otitis media with effusion
Author(s) -
Ahmad Rohail,
Zafar Iqbal Gill,
Muhammad Riaz,
Shahid Imran Ali,
Iqbal Hussain Butt
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
annals of king edward medical university
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2079-7192
pISSN - 2079-0694
DOI - 10.21649/akemu.v12i1.829
Subject(s) - medicine , otitis , effusion , surgery , medical treatment , patient compliance , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine
Aims and objectives: This study is designed: To assess outcome of the two modes of treatment (medical and surgical) of otitis media with effusion in terms of their effectiveness and patient compliance, and to compare in terms of side effects and complications. Sample size: Forty patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria included in the study. They were divided into two groups by random allocation of medical or surgical mode of treatment. Thus each group consisted of twenty patients. Study setting: The study was conducted in the Department of ENT Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Results: In Medically Treated Twenty patients effusion did not resolve in most of the cases, and recovered after some time during the follow-up period. In remaining twenty patients treated surgically, there was immediate improvement in hearing in most of the patients. Conclusion: Complications rate is more in surgical treatment as compared to medical treatment. But in spite of this, surgical treatment is better option in our set-up r egarding effectiveness and patient compliance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here