Open AccessCompensation for harm resulting from the usage of a building: Comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese law
Author(s) -
Evgeniy A. Erbakhaev,
Maxim V. Kratenko
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
vestnik sankt-peterburgskogo universiteta. seriâ 14, pravo/vestnik sankt-peterburgskogo universiteta. pravo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-5833
pISSN - 2074-1243
DOI - 10.21638/spbu14.2021.213
Subject(s) - tort , liability , harm , legislation , law , business , compensation (psychology) , strict liability , legal liability , china , political science , psychology , psychoanalysis
The article examines the problem of compensation for harm caused in the process of using a building and structure. Attention is paid to the side of the defendant in relation to apartment buildings and non-residential buildings, the distribution of liability in the case of a plurality of tortfeasors, the regulation of third-party liability issues by the contract. A comparative analysis of the legislation of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China regulating the liability of building’s owners (users) and contractors involved in the maintenance of a building as well as court practice is conducted. The choice of the Chinese legal system is due to the presence of special rules in Tort Liability Law of China (2009). According to the results of the study, the authors have formulated a number of proposals, in particular: to unify the legal regime for residential and non-residential buildings for the purposes of compensation for harm caused to third parties; to differentiate the liability for harm caused by the destruction of a building (its structural components) and damage due to items falling out from the building (snow or ice falling from the roof, falling advertising designs, objects being thrown out of the building, etc.), to allow the contractual regulation of owner’s liability provided that the victim is given the right to choose the defendant (the building’s owner or the maintenance company, the contractor involved). The authors also argue in favor of a codified act as a source of tort law, which will ensure consistent regulation of the studied relations.