Environmental governance, agency and multi-actor dynamics in Southern Africa

Natural resources have, since the beginning of time, played a central role in supporting human wellbeing. In southern Africa resource consumption has drastically increased over the past 50 years, resulting in biodiversity loss and land degradation. To reduce land degradation and biodiversity loss rates in the region, great emphasis has been placed on building effective governance structures that can deliver environmentally and socially sustainable outcomes. However, environmental governance continues to be a major challenge in the management and conservation of natural resources in the region. Thus, there is renewed scientific and policy interest in strengthening the capacity of governance systems. This thesis is timely; there is an increasing desire by policymakers and land users in the region to develop governance options that enhance multi-actor participation and collaboration. Therefore, this thesis explores the dynamics that influence the capacity of natural resource governance systems in southern Africa, predominately in Machubeni, South Africa (chapters 3 and 4) and in State forests in Zimbabwe (chapter 5). To achieve this aim, four stand-alone manuscripts that answer the following questions are included: 1. How have governance challenges manifested in natural resource management between 2010 and 2020 in southern Africa? 2. How were the governance objectives and attributes applied per historical period and what were the influencing drivers? a. What key drivers influenced rangeland condition over time in Machubeni? 3. How have multi-actor ties changed since the external investment in landscape governance and management in Machubeni, South Africa? 4. What role has agency played in the effectiveness of co-management initiatives in southern Africa? To answer the questions, I applied Bennett and Satterfield’s practical framework for understanding the objectives, attributes and elements of governance and Archer’s ii morphogenetic framework. The study employed a mixed-methods approach which included a scoping review methodology (chapter 2), household surveys, historical records, life history interviews, focus group discussions (chapters 3 and 4), social network analysis (chapter 4) and secondary data analysis (chapter 5). Results from the scoping review (chapter 2) show that research on governance challenges has not increased since 2010. Results suggest that governance challenges related to the maintenance of system integrity and functioning, specifically lack of coordination, accountability, skills, and resources to define effective natural resource management, were the most reported in the literature. Chapter 3 elucidates the importance of history in evaluating the application of governance objectives and rangeland condition in resource-poor areas. The results show that the residual impacts of the ‘ghost of environmental history’ still influence governance dynamics in Machubeni, South Africa. Furthermore, contemporary challenges are linked to history. Chapter 4 shows that transformative spaces enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing between land users, government, and researchers. Finally, chapter 5 employs the morphogenetic framework to assess how agency (the capacity of people and organisations to make choices and decisions about their lives) influenced the effectiveness of co-management initiatives in southern Africa. The results suggest that in attempts to shift governance towards greater effectiveness, more attention should be paid to building individual and group agency. Based on the results from the empirical chapters, the study identified three key focus areas that require more attention in order to build effective landscape governance and management in southern Africa:(i) acknowledging the role of historical legacies and context,(ii) building and developing agency, capacity and trust amongst actors and (iii) the development of sustainable landscape financing mechanisms that will enable governance systems to deliver socially and environmentally sustainable outcomes.