Open AccessHABERMASIAN DISCOURSE THEORY OF MORALITY: A CRITIQUE
Author(s) -
G. P. Bhattacharjee
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of advanced research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2320-5407
DOI - 10.21474/ijar01/13619
Subject(s) - discourse ethics , argumentative , morality , epistemology , communicative action , precondition , ideal (ethics) , sociology , democracy , economic justice , normative ethics , meta ethics , information ethics , philosophy , political science , law , politics , computer science , programming language
In this present work, I have made an attempt to discuss the concept of discourse ethics with its basic characteristics, and finally the main problems concerning Habermasian discourse theory of morality. Discourse ethics is an approach to ethics that is founded upon rules of dialogue, and which encourages participants to approach an ethical dilemma with both pure rational reason and experience firmly in hand. Habermasian discourse ethics is widely known as deliberative democratic theory often praised for its ideals. The concept of communicative action plays a central role in the development of Habermas discourse morality. It is a theory of morality, which claims that moral norms concerning justice can be tested rationally in an argumentative dialogue the ideal precondition is that dialogue should be free from domination. With its various characteristics, some main problems concerning Habermasian Discourse ethics is also discussed in this paper.