z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
CAA 2019: FOR AND AGAINST
Author(s) -
Amanika Kumar,
a Vishal
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of advanced research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2320-5407
DOI - 10.21474/ijar01/12798
Subject(s) - opposition (politics) , law , citizenship , parliament , constitution , political science , duty , immigration , persecution , mantra , apprehension , sociology , politics , psychology , philosophy , theology , cognitive psychology
Citizenship Amendment Act was passed in parliament in 2019 that renders citizenship to persecuted minorities of Indias three neighboring countries i.e., Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Subsequently, wave of protests emerged to oppose this law. Jamia University and different parts of India had seen such protests somewhere it took the shape of violence. Assamese people have their apprehension of illegal immigrants irrespective of religion. But somewhere this bill is colored with religious color as it didnt mention about persecution of Ahmadis in Pakistan. On the other hand why they chose only three neighboring countries, why not Sri-Lanka and Myanmar. Supporters of this law asserted that it is going to defend persecuted minorities who are living in these three countries. And India is playing its duty on its mantra of humanity is first. But on the other hand, opposes alleged this law bias in favor of Hindus and damage very fundamental Structure of constitution. We draw both points in detail. In the introduction, we covered its fundamental feature, then analyzed views in Opposition and at the last views that vindicated this law.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here