Open Access<p>Multiple Mini-Interviews: Current Perspectives on Utility and Limitations</p>
Author(s) -
Sobia Ali,
Muhammad Suleman Sadiq Hashmi,
Mehnaz Umair,
Mirza Aroosa Beg,
Nighat Huda
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
advances in medical education and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1179-7258
DOI - 10.2147/amep.s181332
Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , restructuring , selection (genetic algorithm) , health professionals , health care , psychology , process (computing) , computer science , medical education , medicine , political science , artificial intelligence , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , law , operating system
The growing role of healthcare professionals urged admissions committees to restructure their selection process and assess key personal attributes rather than academic achievements only. Multiple mini interviews (MMIs) were designed in 2002 to assess such domains in prospective healthcare professions. Being a high-stake assessment, the utility and limitations of MMI need to be explored. The purpose of this article is to review the available evidence to establish its utility. The claim of the reliability is verified by the studies assessing the effect of number of stations, duration of stations, format and scoring systems of stations and number of raters assessing the applicants. Similarly, by gathering evidence concerning its content validity, convergent/divergent correlation and predictive ability, validity is ensured. Finally, its acceptability and feasibility along with limitations is discussed. This article concludes by providing recommendations for further work required to deal with the limitations and enhance its utility.