z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative next-generation sequencing of adeno-associated virus inverted terminal repeats
Author(s) -
Karl Petri,
Raffaele Fronza,
Gabriel Rinaldi,
Christine Käppel,
Ali Nowrouzi,
R. J. Linden,
Els Henckaerts,
Manfred Schmidt
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biotechniques/biotechniques
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1940-9818
pISSN - 0736-6205
DOI - 10.2144/000114170
Subject(s) - amplicon , biology , dna sequencing , adeno associated virus , palindrome , sequence (biology) , genetics , inverted repeat , computational biology , microbiology and biotechnology , polymerase chain reaction , dna , gene , recombinant dna , genome , vector (molecular biology)
The inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) of adeno-associated virus (AAV) are notoriously difficult to sequence owing to their high GC-content (70%) and palindromic sequences that result in the formation of a very stable, 125 bp long, T-shaped hairpin structure. Here we evaluate the performance of two widely used next-generation sequencing platforms, 454 GS FLX (Roche) and MiSeq Benchtop Sequencer (Illumina), in analyzing ITRs in comparatively sequencing linear amplification-meditated PCR (LAM-PCR) amplicons derived from AAV-concatemeric structures. While our data indicate that both platforms can sequence complete ITRs, efficiencies (MiSeq: 0.11% of sequence reads; 454: 0.02% of reads), frequencies (MiSeq: 171 full ITRs, 454: 3 full ITRs), and rates of deviation from the derived ITR consensus sequence (MiSeq: 0.8%–1.3%; 454: 0.5%) did differ. These results suggest that next-generation sequencing platforms can be used to specifically detect ITR mutations and sequence complete ITRs.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here