z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effects of Water Regimes on Methane Emissions in Peatland and Gley Marsh
Author(s) -
Zhu Xiaoyan,
Song Changchun,
Chen Weiwei,
Zhang Xinhou,
Tao Baoxian
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2018.01.0017
Subject(s) - gleysol , peat , water table , soil water , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , water content , moisture , atmospheric sciences , soil science , chemistry , groundwater , geography , geology , geotechnical engineering , archaeology , organic chemistry
Core Ideas Large pulses of CH 4 can be emitted during short‐duration drying–wetting episodes. Peatland soils had higher CH 4 emissions than gley marsh soils under a steady water table. Accurate CH 4 estimates should include weather events that cause rapid changes in soil moisture regimes. The increasing frequency of extreme drought and intense precipitation events with global warming may affect CH 4 emissions from different types of wetlands by regulating drying–wetting cycles. To determine the effects of different water regimes on CH 4 emissions, a mesocosm experiment was conducted. Soil cores sampled from peatland and gley marsh were subjected to two drying–wetting cycles (i.e., fluctuating between −10 and 10 cm for 7 and 15 d, respectively) and three steady water table treatments (10, 0, and −10 cm). Alternation between drying and wetting stimulated CH 4 emissions ( F = 16.03 for 7 d and F = 31.85 for 15 d, P < 0.01). The highest emission pulses were observed between 4 and 9 d after the water table increased according to the models. Peak pulse emissions significantly increased by 41% in peatland and 109% in gley marsh after rewetting compared with that in the steady 0‐cm water table treatment. Peatland soils had higher CH 4 emissions than gley marsh soils under steady water table treatments ( P < 0.01). This study shows that large pulses of CH 4 can be emitted during short‐duration drying–wetting episodes. If these pulses are not accounted for in budgets, CH 4 emissions may be incorrectly assessed when comparing with field measurements during regularly spaced sampling intervals over only a few days or weeks by the static opaque chamber technique. Accurate estimates of CH 4 budgets not only depend on increased measurement frequency but by necessity should incorporate weather events that cause rapid changes in the soil moisture regime.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here