z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Measurement and Partitioning of Evapotranspiration for Application to Vadose Zone Studies
Author(s) -
Anderson Ray G.,
Zhang Xudong,
Skaggs Todd H.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2017.08.0155
Subject(s) - eddy covariance , vadose zone , evapotranspiration , environmental science , transpiration , interception , hydrology (agriculture) , atmospheric sciences , soil water , soil science , geology , ecosystem , ecology , photosynthesis , botany , geotechnical engineering , biology
Core Ideas Partitioned evaporation and transpiration is important for validating vadose zone models. New partitioning approaches overcome spatiotemporal limitations of previous methods. Some techniques can be applied to existing data to increase E and T observations. Intercomparisons of approaches at a variety of field sites are needed to better assess each approach. Partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) into its constituent components, evaporation ( E ) and transpiration ( T ), is important for numerous hydrological purposes including assessing impacts of management practices on water use efficiency and improved validation of vadose zone models that parameterize E and T separately. However, most long‐established observational techniques have short observational timescales and spatial footprints, raising questions about the representativeness of these measurements. In the past 15 yr, new approaches have allowed ET partitioning at spatial scales ranging from the pedon to the globe and at long timescales. In this update, we review some recent methodological developments for partitioning ET. These include micrometeorological approaches involving the flux variance partitioning of high‐frequency eddy covariance observations and proxies for photosynthesis and transpiration such as measurements of isotopic fractionation and carbonyl sulfide uptake. We discuss advances in partitioning the energy balance between canopy and soil using remote sensing. We conclude that the flux variance partitioning with raw eddy covariance data and the two‐source energy balance approaches with remote sensing platforms may have the greatest potential for partitioning ET, in part because large public repositories of eddy covariance and satellite data could be readily reprocessed to partition ET.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here