Open AccessEvaluation of Standard Calibration Functions for Eight Electromagnetic Soil Moisture Sensors
Author(s) -
Vaz Carlos M.P.,
Jones Scott,
Meding Mercer,
Tuller Markus
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2012.0160
Subject(s) - soil water , soil science , water content , environmental science , calibration , reflectometry , moisture , soil texture , organic matter , remote sensing , materials science , time domain , geotechnical engineering , geology , chemistry , composite material , mathematics , statistics , organic chemistry , computer science , computer vision
An increasing number of electromagnetic (EM) sensors are deployed to measure volumetric soil water content (θ) for agricultural, ecological, and geotechnical applications. While impedance and capacitance sensors generally operate at frequencies between 20–300 MHz, time domain‐reflectometry (TDR) and‐transmissometry (TDT) function in the GHz range. In general, lower frequency sensors are less expensive but more sensitive to confounding effects of salinity, temperature, and soil textural variations. To simplify sensor application, factory‐supplied calibrations are often provided for different porous media types such as mineral, organic, and saline soils, or soilless‐substrates. The objective of the presented study was to evaluate the performance of eight commercially available EM moisture sensing systems (TDR 100, CS616, Theta Probe, Hydra Probe, SM300, Wet2, 5TE, 10HS) in seven well‐characterized and texturally varying soils using a standardized approach. The validity of factory supplied‐calibration relationships was evaluated and the influence of soil properties on the EM responses for θ measurements was observed. Results indicate that the factory‐supplied calibration relationships for groups of mineral and organic soils in general performed well, but some inconsistences were identified and suggestions for improvement are discussed. Soil‐specific calibrations from this study yielded accuracies of around 0.015 m 3 m −3 for 10HS, SM300, and Theta Probe, while lower accuracies of about 0.025 m 3 m −3 were found for TDR100, CS616, Wet2, 5TE, and the Hydra Probe. These results are based on mineral soils having a large variation in texture, electrical conductivities below 2 dS m −1 , organic matter below 10%, and specific surface areas of less than 50 m 2 g −1 .