Open Access
Coupled Vegetation and Soil Moisture Dynamics Modeling in Heterogeneous and Sloping Terrains
Author(s) -
Cervarolo G.,
Mendicino G.,
Senatore A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2010.0033
Subject(s) - evapotranspiration , terrain , environmental science , vegetation (pathology) , soil water , soil science , leaf area index , water content , hydrology (agriculture) , flux (metallurgy) , atmospheric sciences , flow (mathematics) , geology , geometry , mathematics , geography , ecology , geotechnical engineering , medicine , materials science , cartography , pathology , metallurgy , biology
Two vegetation dynamic models (VDMs) were coupled to a soil–vegetation–atmosphere transfer scheme aimed at simulating water, heat, and CO 2 fluxes and to a three‐dimensional unsaturated flow and heat diffusion model allowing the study of heterogeneous soils and vegetation. The VDMs differ in reproducing gross photosynthesis. One was adapted from a daily model, while the other is a more complex model, needing the continuous monitoring of CO 2 concentration and a larger number of parameters, although it is useful for assessing feedback due to an increase in CO 2 concentration. The two coupled models were validated on a half‐hour time step through leaf area index (LAI), ground energy, and water flux measurements performed during the summer of 2007 and 2009 in an alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) field in the Mediterranean (southern Italy) and during the spring of 2001 in a predominantly C 3 grass covered field (California). Furthermore, the models were used at the field scale in numerical experiments for assessing the effects of model dimensionality on evapotranspiration, CO 2 flux, and LAI in the presence of flat heterogeneous or sloping homogeneous terrains using both the fully three‐dimensional soil water flow model and a simpler model allowing only vertical flow. For the flat terrain experiment, one‐dimensional modeling generally provided significant differences in the simulated quantities with respect to the three‐dimensional model, even though in some cases similar results were found. For the sloping terrain, one‐dimensional modeling proved quite unsuitable for analyzing slope effects, while three‐dimensional modeling allowed detailed description of different degrees of slope interactions between soil moisture dynamics and surface fluxes for different slope angles.