z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Quasi Steady‐State Simulation of the Unsaturated Zone in Groundwater Modeling of Lowland Regions
Author(s) -
Walsum Paul E. V.,
Groenendijk Piet
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2007.0146
Subject(s) - groundwater , phreatic , vadose zone , richards equation , scale (ratio) , water content , watershed , soil science , hydrology (agriculture) , soil water , steady state (chemistry) , environmental science , state variable , computer science , geotechnical engineering , geology , aquifer , chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics , machine learning , thermodynamics
Well‐conceived and detailed simulation of soil‐moisture processes is a prerequisite for accurate watershed‐scale modeling of water quantity and quality processes. For this purpose, Richards' equation (and its extensions) is the conceptually preferable option. Applying the equation on the watershed scale, however, may overstretch available computer resources. At the other extreme, methods based on lumping are oversimplified. Approaches are therefore needed that are efficient and just accurate enough, and that provide the required detail in the vertical column. We have developed a quasi‐steady‐state model that uses a sequence of steady‐state water content profiles for performing dynamic simulations. The appropriate profiles are—for each time level—selected on the basis of water balances at the aggregate scale of control volumes. The groundwater coupling scheme involves an iteration cycle for the phreatic storage coefficient. In the postprocessing stage, the values of state variables obtained using the coupled model are disaggregated, thus delivering pressure heads, moisture contents, and fluxes at the detailed scale of compartments of a Richards‐type model. The plausibility of the simplified approach was tested by comparing its results to those of a Richards‐type model. The results appear promising for at least three‐quarters of the area of the Netherlands with a shallow groundwater elevation (within 2 m of the soil surface) and a thin root zone (<0.5 m thick). Customizing the modeling method used to the situation conserves computational resources, allowing more room for doing sensitivity analyses. This could be instrumental for quantification of model reliability.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here