z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Variable Pore Connectivity Factor Model for Gas Diffusivity in Unsaturated, Aggregated Soil
Author(s) -
Resurreccion Augustus C.,
Moldrup Per,
Kawamoto Ken,
Yoshikawa Seiko,
Rolston Dennis E.,
Komatsu Toshiko
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2007.0058
Subject(s) - soil water , thermal diffusivity , tortuosity , vadose zone , soil science , water potential , characterisation of pore space in soil , pore water pressure , diffusion , water content , chemistry , mineralogy , environmental science , geology , thermodynamics , porosity , physics , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry
The soil gas diffusion coefficient ( D p ) and its variations with soil air content (ε) and soil water matric potential (ψ) control vadose zone transport and emissions of volatile organic chemicals and greenhouse gases. This study revisits the 1904 Buckingham power‐law model where D p is proportional to ε X , with X characterizing the tortuosity and connectivity of air‐filled pore space. One hundred years later, most models linking D p (ε) to soil water retention and pore size distribution still assume that the pore connectivity factor, X , is a constant for a given soil. We show that X varies strongly with both ε and matric potential [given as pF = log(−ψ, cm H 2 O)] for individual soils ranging from undisturbed sand to aggregated volcanic ash soils (Andisols). For Andisols with bimodal pore size distribution, the X –pF function appears symmetrical. The minimum X value is typically around 2 and was observed close to ψ of −1000 cm H 2 O (pF 3) when interaggregate voids are drained. To link D p with bimodal pore size distribution, we coupled a two‐region van Genuchten soil water retention model with the Buckingham D p (ε) model, assuming X to vary symmetrically around a given pF. The coupled model well described D p as a function of both ε and ψ for both repacked and undisturbed Andisols and for other soil types. By merely using average values of the three constants in the proposed symmetrical X –pF expression, predictions of D p were better than with traditional models.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here