Open AccessEstimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure
Author(s) -
Abbaspour K. C.,
Johnson C. A.,
Genuchten M. Th.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
vadose zone journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.036
H-Index - 81
ISSN - 1539-1663
DOI - 10.2136/vzj2004.1340
Subject(s) - latin hypercube sampling , uncertainty analysis , calibration , bracketing (phenomenology) , sampling (signal processing) , function (biology) , uncertainty quantification , mathematics , standard deviation , flow (mathematics) , statistics , monte carlo method , mathematical optimization , environmental science , computer science , philosophy , geometry , epistemology , filter (signal processing) , evolutionary biology , computer vision , biology
Inversely obtained hydrologic parameters are always uncertain (nonunique) because of errors associated with the measurements and the invoked conceptual model, among other factors. Quantification of this uncertainty in multidimensional parameter space is often difficult because of complexities in the structure of the objective function. In this study we describe parameter uncertainties using uniform distributions and fit these distributions iteratively within larger absolute intervals such that two criteria are met: (i) bracketing most of the measured data (>90%) within the 95% prediction uncertainty (95PPU) and (ii) obtaining a small ratio (<1) of the average difference between the upper and lower 95PPU and the standard deviation of the measured data. We define a model as calibrated if, upon reaching these two criteria, a significant R 2 exists between the observed and simulated results. A program, SUFI‐2, was developed and tested for the calibration of two bottom ash landfills. SUFI‐2 performs a combined optimization and uncertainty analysis using a global search procedure and can deal with a large number of parameters through Latin hypercube sampling. We explain the above concepts using an example in which two municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash monofills were successfully calibrated and tested for flow, and one monofill also for transport. Because of high levels of heavy metals in the leachate, monitoring and modeling of such landfills is critical from environmental points of view.