Premium
Phosphorus Limits Nitrogen Dynamics in the O Horizon of a Forested Watershed in Maine, USA
Author(s) -
Salvino Cayce J.,
Patel Kaizad F.,
Fernandez Ivan J.,
Gruselle MarieCécile,
Tatariw Corianne,
MacRae Jean D.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2019.02.0043
Subject(s) - soil water , watershed , deposition (geology) , experimental forest , mineralization (soil science) , nitrogen , environmental chemistry , phosphorus , ammonium , environmental science , nitrification , ecosystem , chemistry , ecology , soil science , geology , biology , paleontology , organic chemistry , machine learning , sediment , computer science
Anthropogenic emissions have altered the N status of forests in the northeastern United States, highlighting the importance of our imperfect understanding of the interaction between nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in response to atmospheric N deposition. We investigated soil N and P dynamics at the Bear Brook Watershed in Maine (BBWM), a long‐term paired watershed experiment established to study ecosystem response to experimental N enrichment. One watershed (West Bear [WB]) was treated bimonthly for 25 yr with ammonium sulfate, and the reference East Bear (EB) received only ambient N deposition. We conducted field and laboratory studies to examine the interaction between N and P in O horizon soils in both EB and WB. In the “Field Addition” study, an addition of 100 kg P ha −1 resulted in an overall 38% decrease in extractable ammonium (NH 4 + –N) due to increased immobilization. Even under ambient N deposition rates, EB displayed parallel, although lower, evidence of P limitation compared with WB. In contrast, in the “Laboratory Addition” study, soils incubated in the laboratory at rates of 0 to 200 kg P ha −1 showed increases in potential net N mineralization (PNNM) and NH 4 + –N concentrations in response to P additions. There was no effect of N status in the Laboratory Addition study, but hardwood soils showed a faster response and greater rates of PNNM compared with softwood soils. Despite contrasting responses, both the field and laboratory studies suggested that N dynamics at BBWM were P limited and that N status and forest type influenced the N and P interaction. Core Ideas N transformations in Maine's forest soils are P limited. P limitation is greater in N‐enriched soils. Hardwood soils show greater response to P additions than softwood soils.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom