z-logo
Premium
Long‐Term Soil Changes from Forest Harvesting and Residue Management in the Northern Rocky Mountains
Author(s) -
Jang Woongsoon,
Page-Dumroese Deborah S.,
Keyes Christopher R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2015.11.0413
Subject(s) - environmental science , bulk density , litter , shrub , forest floor , agronomy , vegetation (pathology) , forest management , soil water , forestry , agroforestry , soil science , ecology , biology , geography , medicine , pathology
Core Ideas Long‐term (38 yr) soil changes after woody residue management were evaluated. There were no differences in soil physical and chemical properties. Differences in extractable cation pools may be due to different vegetation litter inputs. Soil changes associated with forest harvesting, differing utilization levels, and post‐harvest prescribed burning were determined using an empirical study to investigate the long‐term impacts on soil physical and chemical properties at Coram Experimental Forest in northwestern Montana. In 1974, two replications of three regeneration cuttings (shelterwood, group selection, and clearcut) were installed. In addition, four residue management regimes (high utilization with no burning, medium with no burning, medium with broadcast burning, and low with broadcast burning) were implemented (∼74, 63, 65, and 54% wood removal, respectively). Thirty‐eight years after harvesting, changes were evaluated in mineral soil and forest floor physical and chemical properties (organic matter [OM], C, N, Ca, K, and Mg pools, soil bulk density, and pH) and in coarse woody debris levels. There were no differences in soil pH and bulk density across all regeneration cuttings and residue treatments, probably due to the minimal soil effects associated with the forest harvesting operations that were used (hand felling and cable yarding). Comparisons between harvest and burning and the control indicate no statistical differences in OM, C, and N contents. Minor differences in extractable cation pools were noted in several comparisons among the treatments; these may be attributed to litter inputs from the differing vegetation compositions of overstory and shrub layers rather than nutrient changes within the mineral soil itself. At this moist‐cool forest, intensive biomass utilization, with or without broadcast burning, had few long‐term impacts on soil properties of soil C, OM, and nutrients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here