Premium
Best Management Practices for Summer Fallow in the World's Driest Rainfed Wheat Region
Author(s) -
Schillinger William F.,
Young Douglas L.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2014.04.0168
Subject(s) - summer fallow , tillage , sowing , agronomy , environmental science , conventional tillage , hectare , precipitation , geography , agroforestry , agriculture , biology , archaeology , meteorology , cropping
The Horse Heaven Hills (HHH) located in south‐central Washington contains the world's driest rainfed wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) production region, where farms receive as little as 150 mm average annual precipitation. Late summer establishment of winter wheat into carryover seed‐zone water after a year of fallow is essential to achieve the highest grain yield potential. Tillage of fallow land during the spring is considered necessary to retain adequate seed‐zone water during the dry summer months, but blowing dust from excessively tilled fallow is a major safety, environmental, and soil‐quality concern. We compared three fallow management systems for soil water dynamics, wheat stand establishment, grain yield, and economic returns on two farms over 5 yr in western and eastern portions of the HHH where long‐term annual precipitation averages 153 and 211 mm, respectively. Treatments were: (i) traditional tillage (TTF), undercutter conservation tillage (UTF), and no‐till (NTF). Late‐summer planting of winter wheat in TTF and UTF was possible in only 1 of 5 yr at the western site due to lack of adequate seed‐zone water, whereas late‐summer planting was possible every year at the eastern site. There were no significant differences in net economic returns among fallow management treatments at the western site; however, net returns per hectare averaged a positive US$101 for TTF and UFT vs. a negative US$92 for NTF at the eastern site. Although seed‐zone water in late summer was consistently lowest with NTF at both sites, we recommend NTF in the western HHH because achieving adequate seed‐zone water for early wheat establishment is generally not possible with any fallow management practice and NTF is economically viable and excellent for wind erosion control. On the other hand, in the eastern HHH, where adequate seed‐zone water for early planting can be achieved with tillage most years, farmers should practice UTF. This study documented that NTF in the western HHH and UTF in the eastern HHH are best management practices for farmers and the environment in a region where wind erosion from excessively tilled soils is a severe problem.