Premium
Root Responses to Alterations in Macroporosity and Penetrability in a Silt Loam Soil
Author(s) -
Hernandez-Ramirez Guillermo,
Lawrence-Smith Erin J.,
Sinton Sarah M.,
Tabley Frank,
Schwen Andreas,
Beare Michael H.,
Brown Hamish E.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2014.01.0005
Subject(s) - loam , bulk density , soil science , silt , compaction , soil compaction , soil water , macropore , soil horizon , hordeum vulgare , soil structure , environmental science , agronomy , chemistry , materials science , geology , poaceae , biology , composite material , mesoporous material , paleontology , biochemistry , catalysis
Changes in soil physical conditions can have an impact on plant root growth. However, the underlying functional responses of root growth to variations in soil physical properties still remain poorly understood. We assessed the responses of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) roots to a typical range of soil physical properties created by applying different degrees of loosening or compaction to subsurface soil layers. A replicated field experiment was established on a Templeton silt loam soil (Dystric Ustochrept) in Canterbury, New Zealand. Following removal of the top 15 cm of soil, five mechanical treatments were applied: loosened by cultivation, three degrees of compaction using a roller (one pass, eight passes, and eight passes with vibration), and an untreated control. Subsequently, the top 15 cm of soil was repositioned. The impact of these treatments on soil physical properties in the subsurface soil layer (15–30 cm) produced a discernible gradient that was well characterized by shifts in pore‐size distribution, in particular macroporosity (radii > 30 μm). Macroporosity values were well represented throughout the range from 0.035 up to 0.20 m 3 m −3 ( n = 50), and these values were negatively correlated with both penetration resistance and bulk density measurements ( r ≤ −0.80; P < 0.001). We found clear responses of root growth to this established gradient. As macroporosity decreased, root diameter increased by 42% ( r = −0.63), while root length density decreased by 65% ( r = +0.66). However, these divergent responses of root diameter and length density to changes in macroporosity were not linear over the whole range but exhibited specific response thresholds. The thresholds of macroporosity, where root responses inflected and became particularly pronounced, were <0.077 m 3 m −3 for root diameter and >0.12 m 3 m −3 for root length density, suggesting that macroporosity values above 0.13 m 3 m −3 can facilitate root growth. Although these belowground responses were clearly evident, we detected no effects of these varying conditions on aboveground plant productivity. Moreover, the results also indicate that moderate‐to‐high soil water contents during the early stages of plant development allow annual roots to overcome potentially restricting soil physical conditions.