Premium
Use of Nitrogen Calibration Ramps and Canopy Reflectance on Farmers' Irrigated Cotton Fields
Author(s) -
Bronson K. F.,
Wheeler T. A.,
Brown C. M.,
Taylor R. K.,
Scharf P. C.,
Barnes E. M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2011.0344
Subject(s) - lint , normalized difference vegetation index , canopy , irrigation , agronomy , fertilizer , environmental science , fiber crop , growing season , crop , calibration , yield (engineering) , mathematics , malvaceae , leaf area index , botany , biology , statistics , materials science , metallurgy
Nitrogen is the main nutrient limiting irrigated cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production in the southwestern United States. Canopy spectral reflectance may assess the need for in‐season N in irrigated cotton and guide N fertilizer applications. However, calibration of remote sensing indices such as normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) to the crop's need for N fertilizer is difficult. Well‐fertilized reference strips or plots reference NDVI data in the crop area of interest but can result in rank growth and reduced lint yields. Recently, Oklahoma State University developed a calibration procedure of using multiple, sequential, N rate calibration plots, or a ramp approach for wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) and corn ( Zea mays L.). We tested this approach in irrigated cotton fields in Lubbock County, Texas, in 2008 and 2009. The main objective of this research was to test a calibration ramp approach to determining optimum in‐season N fertilizer rates in irrigated cotton in West Texas. Near infrared, red, and amber reflectance was measured with active spectroradiometers at 1 m above the canopy. Wide ranges in soil type and irrigation amounts influenced NDVI much more than N fertilizer rate. Normalized difference vegetative index at mid‐bloom and at peak bloom were positively related to N fertilizer rate in only one ramp in each year. These two ramp‐years also had significant N fertilizer rate response in lint yield. Ramps that did not have mid‐ or peak bloom NDVI responses to N rate, likewise had no lint yield response to N rate. In both low irrigation‐ low N input and in high irrigation‐high N input farms, in‐season NDVI correctly predicted lint yield response to N fertilizer rate.