Premium
Soil Carbon Dioxide Production and Climatic Sensitivity in Contrasting California Ecosystems
Author(s) -
Sanderman Jonathan,
Amundson Ronald
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2009.0290
Subject(s) - environmental science , soil respiration , ecosystem , ecosystem respiration , microclimate , carbon dioxide , grassland , growing season , flux (metallurgy) , canopy , soil water , hydrology (agriculture) , agronomy , soil science , ecology , primary production , chemistry , biology , geology , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry
Despite the wealth of information available on respiratory fluxes of CO 2 from the soil surface, relatively few studies have examined the depth‐related flux and production of CO 2 within the soil. We developed a depth‐integrated CO 2 flux model based on soil profile CO 2 measurements to explore both the temporal and spatial patterns of, and controls on, CO 2 production in two contrasting California coastal ecosystems: a redwood [ Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) Endl.] forest and a seasonal grassland ecosystem. In the forest, CO 2 production increased exponentially with temperature but the dominant control on CO 2 efflux was due to changes in soil diffusivity with water content. Here, ∼67% of the total efflux was produced in the top 20 cm, with little seasonal variation. In the grassland, soil temperature and water content both exerted strong positive controls on CO 2 production, with CO 2 efflux highest in early spring (8 g C m −2 d −1 ) and lowest in late summer (0.4 g C m −2 d −1 ). Here, the relative proportion of total respiration in the top 20 cm varied from 5% at the end of the dry season to 70% during the wet winter months. Soil respiration in the redwood soil appeared to be well buffered from climate extremes due to the stable microclimate created by the forest canopy. The grassland soil, however, lacking such buffering, was subject to large and rapid changes in CO 2 production throughout the year. These results indicate that despite some uncertainty in the calculation of diffusion rates, significantly more information on soil biological processes is gained from the CO 2 production–diffusion approach than from surface flux measurements alone.