z-logo
Premium
Abiotic Nitrate Retention in Agroecosystems and a Forest Soil
Author(s) -
Fricks B.,
Kaye J.,
Seidel R.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2008.0199
Subject(s) - abiotic component , soil water , nitrate , environmental science , incubation , ecosystem , environmental chemistry , chemistry , agronomy , soil science , ecology , biology , biochemistry
Agricultural ecosystems are the primary source of nitrate (NO 3 − ) pollution in many watersheds. We used a laboratory 15 N tracer study with live and gamma irradiated soils to examine the role of land management in abiotic retention of NO 3 − in three agroecosytems and a forest soil. Nitrogen retention was defined as the quantity of 15 N that remained in soil following salt extractions. Land management only affected N retention after 15 min of incubation, with forested soils retaining <4% of the added 15 N and agricultural soils retaining <1%. In all four ecosystems, abiotic retention (retention in gamma irradiated soils) occurred after 1 d (15–20% of the 15 N) and 21 d (up to 60% of 15 N) of incubation. After 1 and 21 d, 15 N retention in irradiated soils was larger than in live soils, revealing a methodological artifact associated with gamma irradiation. While our results show that abiotic reactions can occur in the laboratory, it is unlikely that such high rates of abiotic 15 N retention occur in the field. Gamma irradiation appears to impart methodological artifacts that limit its use in partitioning microbial and abiotic N retention in soils.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom