Premium
Agroforestry and Grass Buffer Effects on Pore Characteristics Measured by High‐Resolution X‐ray Computed Tomography
Author(s) -
Udawatta Ranjith P.,
Gantzer Clark J.,
Anderson Stephen H.,
Garrett Harold E.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2007.0057
Subject(s) - loam , lotus corniculatus , agronomy , bromus , forage , crop rotation , crop , mathematics , soil science , environmental science , soil water , poaceae , biology
Agroforestry and grass buffers can improve infiltration and reduce runoff from row‐crop agriculture. The objective of this study was to examine buffer effects on soil porosity using high‐resolution x‐ray computed tomography (CT). Treatments studied were agroforestry buffer, grass buffer, and row crop (RC) on a Putnam silt loam (fine, smectitic, mesic Vertic Albaqualf). A no‐till corn ( Zea mays L.)‐soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation was established in 1991, with buffers implemented in 1997. Agroforestry buffers, 4.5 m wide and 36.5 m apart, consisted of pin oak ( Quercus palustris Münchh.) trees planted among redtop ( Agrostis gigantea Roth) and brome ( Bromus spp.) grasses and birdsfoot trefoil ( Lotus corniculatus L.). Two replicates of intact soil cores (76‐mm diam. by 76‐mm long) were collected from the 0‐ to 100‐mm depth. Cores were scanned at a voxel size of 73 by 73 by 84 μm. Images were analyzed with Three‐Dimensional Medial Axis (3DMA) software. The average pore paths for grass and agroforestry buffer samples were three and five times greater, respectively, than for RC. On average, buffer samples had a 33% higher characteristic coordination number than RC samples. Buffer samples had a higher characteristic path length constant (2.18 times the RC treatment) and an average lower path tortuosity (89% of the RC treatment) relative to values for RC. Average nodal pore volume and throat radii of buffers were 1.8 and 2.9 times larger, respectively, than for RC. Results show that three‐dimensional structural differences caused by variations in root growth or organic matter accumulation discriminated between buffer and row crop soil, allowing better quantification of management effects on soil porosity.