Premium
Characterizing Soil Water‐Conducting Macro and Mesoporosity as Influenced by Tillage Using Tension Infiltrometry
Author(s) -
Moret D.,
Arrúe J. L.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2006.0128
Subject(s) - infiltrometer , tillage , hydraulic conductivity , loam , soil science , macropore , soil water , porosity , environmental science , saturation (graph theory) , conventional tillage , water retention curve , hydrology (agriculture) , mesoporous material , chemistry , mathematics , geology , geotechnical engineering , agronomy , biochemistry , combinatorics , biology , catalysis
Knowledge of soil water conductive porosity is of paramount importance for understanding the water and solute movement in soil. The objective of this study was to describe and evaluate an alternative pore index, i.e., the representative mean pore radius for two consecutive soil water tensions (λ ΔΨ ), for characterizing the water‐transmitting macro‐ and mesoporosity of soil. The hydraulic conductivity (K) and related hydraulic parameters were measured using a tension disk infiltrometer at −14, −4, −1, and 0 cm water pressure heads at a soil depth of 2 cm on a long‐term conservation tillage experiment (after 9 yr of trial) under conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT), and no‐tillage (NT) treatments. The soil was loam (Xerollic Calciorthid). The measurements were performed within the first half of a 16‐ to 18‐mo‐long fallow period. Unlike the model based on the classical capillary rise theory, which assumes no differences between measurement sites (e.g., tillage treatments) for the corresponding equivalent pore radius (C 0 ) for macro‐ and mesopores, significant differences in λ ΔΨ values for macro‐ and mesopores were found between the three tillage systems tested. The number of water‐transmitting macro‐ and mesopores per unit area estimated by means of the capillary rise approach was significantly greater than that calculated using the λ ΔΨ pore index. Although significantly higher values of λ ΔΨ for both macro‐ and mesopores were observed under NT, a significantly lower near‐saturation K was found under NT than CT and RT treatments due to the lower density of water‐transmitting macro‐ and mesopores.