Premium
Influence of Tillage Practices on Soil Structural Controls over Carbon Mineralization
Author(s) -
Yoo Gayoung,
Wander Michelle M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2005.0036
Subject(s) - loam , tillage , soil water , mineralization (soil science) , soil carbon , water content , soil science , environmental science , moisture , conventional tillage , bulk density , total organic carbon , silt , chemistry , agronomy , environmental chemistry , geology , paleontology , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , biology
The influence of tillage practices on soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics is manifested indirectly through the modification of soil structure. This study was conducted at two sites in Illinois where long‐term use of conventional (CT) and no tillage (NT) practices has increased SOC at Monmouth, a silt loam, but not at DeKalb, a silty clay loam soil with higher SOC contents. We evaluated whether soil structural quality could be related to observed SOC mineralization and explain the inconsistent influence of tillage on SOC stocks. Soil physical parameters and soil CO 2 evolution rates were measured in 2000, 2001, and 2002. At DeKalb, there was no difference in the mean (μmol m −1 s −1 ) or specific (μgCO 2 s −1 /μg SOC) SOC mineralization rates of NT and CT soils. In Monmouth, mean and specific SOC mineralization rates were greater from soils under CT than NT management. This indicates use of NT practices had increased physical protection of SOC at that site. The Q 10 equation, which is based on soil temperature and moisture, better explained CO 2 efflux in DeKalb than in Monmouth. The poorer fit of the equation in Monmouth reflects its reliance on gravimetric moisture content, which inadequately describes the status of soil water influencing heterotrophic activity. The least limiting water range (LLWR), which integrates the affects of clay content, bulk density, and soil moisture on biological activity and predicted observed soil CO 2 efflux patterns ( R = 0.600, p = 0.0025) better than any other physical parameter, indicated use of NT practices at Monmouth increased soil compaction or strength enough to reduce C mineralization. In DeKalb, where soils have an inherently high capacity to protect SOC from decay, tillage has had no influence on SOC dynamics. The variable affect of tillage practices on C sequestration were explained by soil physical properties.