Premium
Rainfall Timing and Ammonia Loss from Urea in a Loblolly Pine Plantation
Author(s) -
Kissel D. E.,
Cabrera M. L.,
Vaio N.,
Craig J. R.,
Rema J. A.,
Morris L. A.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2004.1744
Subject(s) - urea , ammonia volatilization from urea , ammonia , leaching (pedology) , fertilizer , chemistry , dew , nitrogen , loblolly pine , volatilisation , environmental chemistry , zoology , agronomy , environmental science , soil water , pinus <genus> , soil science , botany , biology , biochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , condensation , thermodynamics
Surface application of urea to pine forests may lead to ammonia (NH 3 ) loss. It is generally believed that rainfall received soon after urea application will wash the urea and its hydrolysis products into the soil and stop NH 3 loss, but quantitative data are lacking, especially for the forest environment. The objective of this study was to quantify the effect of rainfall on loss of NH 3 when received at different times following urea application. Four field studies were performed in a midrotation loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) plantation, where NH 3 volatilization chambers were fertilized with 200 kg ha −1 N and NH 3 losses were measured for either 29 or 58 d. In a complementary lab study, both NH 3 loss and movement of fertilizer N into the soil were measured following simulated rain. Loss of NH 3 from urea was either increased or not affected by simulated rainfall applied after the urea granules were dissolved by dew. Increased NH 3 loss due to simulated rainfall was attributed to inefficient downward leaching of urea and increased water content, which is known to increase the rate of urea hydrolysis. In contrast, simulated rainfall applied immediately after urea application reduced NH 3 losses to <1% of the applied urea. Our results show that unless rain occurs before urea is dissolved by morning dew, it may not be effective at leaching urea into the soil and reducing NH 3 losses. Further research should be conducted to elucidate the mechanism of urea retention by the O horizon in pine forests.