z-logo
Premium
Fractal Analysis of Soil Water Desorption Data Collected on Disturbed Samples with Water Activity Meters
Author(s) -
Perfect E.,
Kenst A. B.,
Díaz-Zorita M.,
Grove J. H.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2004.1177
Subject(s) - loam , fractal dimension , soil science , soil water , hydrology (agriculture) , mathematics , bulk density , gravimetric analysis , tillage , fractal , environmental science , chemistry , geology , geotechnical engineering , agronomy , mathematical analysis , biology , organic chemistry
We combined water activity meters and fractal modeling to facilitate rapid, physically based characterization of the soil water retention curve. Desorption data (6 points per sample) were collected in the tension ( h ) range 2.0 × 10 2 to 1.5 × 10 5 kPa using the gravimetric method to measure water content ( w ) and water activity meters to measure h Thirty‐two disturbed samples from a long‐term nitrogen fertilization and tillage comparison study on a silt loam soil were analyzed. A new form of an established fractal equation was derived: w = ah D− 3 − ρ w / ρ s , where a is a compound parameter including the bulk density (ρ b ) and air entry tension ( h a ), D is the mass fractal dimension, ρ w is the density of water, and ρ s is the particle density. This model was fitted to the measured water retention curves by nonlinear regression analysis. The a and D parameters were estimated, while ρ w and ρ s were fixed at 1.00 and 2.65 Mg m −3 , respectively. Convergence was always achieved and the equation fitted the data extremely well; residual sums of squares ranged from 1.2 × 10 −6 to 6.7 × 10 −5 , with a median value of 2.2 × 10 −5 Estimates of a (0.62–0.74) and D (2.948–2.963) were physically reasonable, and sensitive to soil management practices. The a parameter increased, r = 0.80 ( P < 0.01), (signifying decreasing ρ b and/or h a ) whereas D decreased, r = −0.75 ( P < 0.01), (signifying more rapid capillary drainage) with increasing soil carbon content. Additional research is needed to test this approach on other soil types, and to assess the influence of soil disturbance and variations in ρ s on the model's performance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here