Premium
AUTOMATION OF A FALLING HEAD PERMEAMETER FOR RAPID DETERMINATION OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF MULTIPLE SAMPLES
Author(s) -
Johnson D. O.,
Arriaga F. J.,
Lowery Birl
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2004.0014n
Subject(s) - permeameter , loam , hydraulic conductivity , head (geology) , pressure head , soil test , hydraulic head , environmental science , soil science , geotechnical engineering , silt , laboratory automation , falling (accident) , geology , soil water , automation , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , geomorphology , medicine , environmental health
Measuring hydraulic conductivity of saturated soil (K s ) is one way to quantify soil hydraulic properties. However, this technique is very time consuming for both in situ and laboratory measurements, and often one is limited to measuring only one sample at a given time. Automation of hydraulic measurements has been suggested, but this has not been done for laboratory K s measurements. Thus, we propose to use pressure transducers to measure K s in multiple soil cores with a falling head permeameter. To accomplish this, an automated falling head permeameter was developed by attaching pressure transducers to falling head permeameters to measure K s of soil cores in the laboratory and a datalogger was used to record the readings. To test this method, 64 soil core samples were taken from two locations, 30 from a sandy soil, 23 from a silt loam soil, and 11 from a silty clay loam soil. The automated unit allows for six samples to be processed with minimal human oversight compared with only one sample being read manually (conventional method), requiring frequent observations during a period often >30 min. When values obtained using the automated method were compared with values obtained for the same cores using the manual technique, there was no statistical difference at the 95% level.