Premium
Accounting for Soil Spatial Autocorrelation in the Design of Experimental Trials
Author(s) -
Fagroud M.,
Van Meirvenne M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj2002.1134
Subject(s) - variogram , autocorrelation , block (permutation group theory) , geostatistics , spatial analysis , statistics , soil science , block design , spatial variability , block size , mathematics , plot (graphics) , field (mathematics) , environmental science , computer science , kriging , geometry , computer security , key (lock) , pure mathematics
Soil heterogeneity complicates the design and analysis of field experiments. Block designs were developed for this purpose. However, the analysis of experimental results supposes that the residuals from the treatment are spatially independent and that within block variation is random. Experience indicates that this rarely is the case in field experiments, because of the strong spatial autocorrelation of soil properties. This paper applies geostatistical tools, such as variogram analysis and conditional stochastic simulation, to investigate the optimal experimental plot size and shape and to decide which experimental design is to be preferred. The methodology is illustrated using a case study of water‐use efficiency under semiarid conditions in Morocco. It was found that under these conditions an experiment with 16 treatments would use best a plot size of 4 by 8 m oriented north‐south, configured according to an incomplete block design with 8 plots per block oriented in two rows in the east‐west direction.