Premium
Water and Nitrogen Management of Sugarcane Grown on Sandy, High‐Water‐Table Soil
Author(s) -
Obreza T. A.,
Pitts D. J.,
Anderson D. L.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200040021x
Subject(s) - soil water , saccharum , human fertilization , fertilizer , water table , cane , zoology , agronomy , sugar , chemistry , environmental science , nitrogen , biology , soil science , groundwater , geology , biochemistry , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry
Abstract Little information exists regarding water and N fertilizer management for sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) production on Florida's high‐water‐table sandy soils. We hypothesized that sugar yield and N‐use efficiency would be affected by water table depth and N fertilizer application timing. Sugarcane (cv. CP 72‐1210) was grown in >1‐ha plots for three seasons on Basinger sand (siliceous, hyperthermic Spodic Psammaquent) to determine the effects of water table depth (0.46 vs. 0.57 m), N fertilization frequency (13 vs. 7 split applications for 3 yr, at 224 kg N ha ‐1 yr ‐1 ), and Mg fertilizer rate (0 vs. 60 kg Mg ha ‐1 yr ‐1 ) on cane and sugar yields. Annual mean high‐ and low‐water‐table differences were 0.13, 0.11, and 0.10 m, resulting in a 0.2 to 1.4 J kg ‐1 difference in soil water matric potential at middle of the root zone, and a 0.02 to 0.11 m 3 m ‐3 difference in soil water concentration in the top 0.30 m. Three‐year mean yields for low vs. high water table were 73.7 vs. 67.9 t sugarcane ha ‐1 and 9.23 vs. 8.51 t sugar ha ‐1 . High vs. low N fertilization frequency yielded 75.0 vs. 66.5 t sugarcane ha ‐1 and 9.41 vs. 8.33 t sugar ha ‐1 . There were no water level × N fertilization frequency interactions. Where mean Mehlich 1 extractable Mg was 25 mg kg ‐1 , Mg fertilization did not affect yield, suggesting that this Mg level should be classified in the unresponsive (“high”) range. Although increasing N fertilization frequency increases the fertilization program cost, its use is justified by increased sugar yield.