Premium
Wyoming Rocky Mountain Forest Soils: Mapping Using an ARC/INFO Geographic Information System
Author(s) -
Rahman S.,
Munn L. C.,
Vance G. F.,
Arneson C.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100060026x
Subject(s) - soil map , soil water , watershed , soil survey , geographic information system , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental science , geology , soil science , remote sensing , geotechnical engineering , machine learning , computer science
In the western USA, wildland soil survey areas are often large, and the resources of money, personnel, and time required for conventional soil survey techniques are in short supply. We evaluated an alternative methodology for producing soil maps through a process of transecting, model construction, and projection onto a map base using ARC/INFO geographic information system (GIS) technology. We conducted this study in the Libby Creek watershed in Wyoming where soil distribution (Cryoboralfs, Cryoborolls, Cryaquolls, Cryaquents, Cryochrepts, and Cryorthents) is a function of geology, slope stability, and vegetation. The GIS‐generated soils map was compared with existing general (Order 4) and detailed (Order 3) soils maps prepared for the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). Discrepancies noted between the GIS‐generated map and USFS maps included: Cryochrepts were the dominant soil on the GIS map (44%), but comprised only 15% on the USFS detailed soils map; Cryumbrepts occupied 19% of the USFS general soils map but only 2% on the GIS‐derived soils map; and no Cryumbrepts were delineated in the study area on the USFS detailed soils map. Only two of the eight Cryumbrepts sampled occurred within Cryumbrept delineations on the USFS general soils map. Of the 37 pedons sampled and classified along the five transects across Libby Creek watershed, 11 (30%) corresponded to named soils of mapping units in the USFS general soils map, and 20 (54%) coincided on the USFS detailed soils map. Results of this study suggest transecting and GIS‐based mapping can be an effective technique for producing general soils maps, and can aid in placing soil boundaries for detailed soils maps.