z-logo
Premium
Spatial Variability of Water Fluxes in Soil: A Field Study
Author(s) -
Heuvelman W. J.,
McInnes K. J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040007x
Subject(s) - spatial variability , soil science , environmental science , interception , hydrology (agriculture) , soil texture , subsoil , topsoil , soil horizon , soil water , loam , infiltration (hvac) , geology , mathematics , geography , ecology , geotechnical engineering , meteorology , statistics , biology
Knowledge of spatial variability of soil properties is important for soil sampling and modeling water and solute transport through soil. A field study was conducted on a Silawa‐variant loamy fine sand (fine, mixed, thermic Udic Paleustalf) in Brazos County, Texas, to evaluate spatial variability and convergence and divergence of water fluxes through the soil profile. A 7 by 14 grid of interception cells (each 25 by 25 mm) was built to collect surface‐applied water at 0.3‐, 0.9‐, and 1.2‐m depth. The interception cells were installed on the ceilings of tunnels that had been hand dug horizontally into the walls of a large backhoe‐dug pit. Water was applied under a positive head of ≈50 mm in a 1.2 by 1.2 m infiltration square. Normal and lognormal probability functions were fitted to frequency distributions of intercepted fluxes from topsoil and subsoil, respectively, with correlation coefficients of 0.95 and higher. Most nonmatrix flow was found at 0.9 m in the Bt2 horizon. We speculate that fluxes were most heterogeneous in this horizon because of associated soil texture and structure. Compared with soil at 0.3 and 1.2 m, texture was finer, peds were larger, and clay films were more abundant at 0.9 m. This relationship with pedologic development suggests that descriptions of texture and structure might be used to predict spatial distributions of fluxes and design sampling schemes. Convergence of water flowpaths was observed from 0.3 to 0.9 m while divergence occurred from 0.9 to 1.2 m.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here