z-logo
Premium
Soil and Sustainable Forest Productivity: A Preamble
Author(s) -
Powers R. F.,
Morrison I. K.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000060003x
Subject(s) - preamble , productivity , service (business) , library science , citation , microform , natural resource , sustainable development , forestry , political science , geography , computer science , business , telecommunications , law , economics , economic growth , channel (broadcasting) , marketing
S is FUNDAMENTAL to the affairs of mankind. Since the first experiment s of Nicholas of Cusa in the early 15th century, advances in soil and plant science have hastene d social progres through the production of food, fuel, and shelter . Knowledge of soil and plant interactions aided the revolution in domesti c agriculture and the dramati c rise in the land' s capacit y to meet our daily needs. Sustainabl e agriculture is seen as "a given" in most developed nations of the world. But concept s of scientific forestry and sustained forest productivity have a shorter history. They began in central Europe in the late 18th century in respons e to accelerate d harvesting in the period of the Industrial Revolution. Concept s of allowable cut and sustained yield took form and then spread rapidly to other regions of Europe. During the 1870s, concerns over extensive forest clearing reached our easter n shores, triggering a conservation movement in both the USA and Canada that solidified by the early 20th century. Forged from this were the American Forestr y Association, Canadian Forestr y Association, Societ y of American Foresters , Canadian Institute of Forestry, and the Forest Services of both the USA and Canada. An ethic had evolved that forests shoul d be managed in ways that wil l benefi t generations beyond our own. Yet, strong voices debat e whether modern forestry can sustai n our future needs. The controversy began with the rise of the environmenta l movement in the mid-1950s, a growing distrust of technology, and a change in the way that forests were seen by society. Consequently , sizabl e tracts of forests have been and are being reserved for purposes other than traditional wood production.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here