z-logo
Premium
Tillage Effects on Thermal Conductivity of Two Soils in Northern British Columbia
Author(s) -
Azooz R. H.,
Arshad M. A.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900050030x
Subject(s) - loam , tillage , soil water , sowing , silt , soil science , conventional tillage , agronomy , zoology , environmental science , geology , biology , geomorphology
Tillage management practices may affect crop growth, in part by altering soil thermal properties. Effects of long‐term conventional (CT), no tillage (NT), and modified no tillage (NTR: NT with surface residue pushed away from a 7.5‐cm zone over the seed rows) systems on soil thermal conductivity ( K ) and water content (θ) were evaluated on Donnelly silt loam and sandy loam (Typic Cryoboralfs). Measured K (M1) was compared with calculated K using the McInnes equation (M2) and a modified McInnes equation (M3, which included additional soil properties). The K in both soils increased with an increase in soil θ; the differences among the tillage systems decreased as the soil dried. Soil K for the silt loam was 0.81 (θ = 0.13 m 3 m −3 ), 0.83 (θ = 0.14 m 3 m −3 ), and 0.84 W m −1 K −1 (θ = 0.15 m 3 m −3 ) in CT, NTR, and NT, respectively, at 25 d after planting in 1992 (a dry year). It was 1.13 (θ = 0.42 m 3 m −3 ), 1.53 (θ = 0.50 m 3 m −3 ) and 1.55 W m −1 K −1 (θ = 0.57 m 3 m −3 ) in CT, NTR, and NT, respectively, at 47 d after planting in 1993 (a wet year). Soil K for sandy loam was significantly lower than for silt loam. Soil K measured by M1 and calculated by both the M2 and M3 methods were highly correlated. However, the calculated K values were somewhat improved, although not significantly, with the M3. Mean K was lower by 0.133 W m −1 K −1 in M2 and by 0.045 W m −1 K −1 in M3 than in M1 under CT on silt loam. Increased soil water storage under long‐term NT produced a greater thermal contact area and, consequently, a significantly greater K under NT and NTR than CT.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here