Premium
Flood Irrigation of a Cracked Soil
Author(s) -
Mitchell Alan R.,
Genuchten M. Th.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700020032x
Subject(s) - infiltration (hvac) , environmental science , lysimeter , irrigation , soil water , agronomy , leaching (pedology) , soil structure , leaching model , soil science , hydrology (agriculture) , soil salinity , geology , materials science , geotechnical engineering , biology , composite material
Abstract An understanding of water flow into cracking, irrigated soils is necessary in order to address problems of plant water stress, inefficient water application, lack of aeration, and salt accumulation in the soil due to inadequate leaching. The objectives of this study were to investigate water infiltration into a cracked clay soil during flood irrigation, and to observe the differences in infiltration and cracking patterns between fallow soil following wheat ( Triticum turgidum L. ‘Yecoro Rojo’) and soil under alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L. ‘CUF 101’). A large weighing lysimeter was used to measure infiltration and evaporation. The infiltration was analyzed as consisting of three phases of crack filling, sorption, and transmission. The infiltration curves were found to be similar for all irrigations, with a larger percentage of the total infiltrated water initially entering the cracks of the drier alfalfa soil (74%) than the wheat‐cropped soil (63%). Final infiltration rates were 0.4 and 0.6 mm h ‐1 for the alfalfa and wheat irrigations, respectively. Evaporation was shown to be a large component of water loss during the later stages of irrigation, sometimes exceeding the infiltration rate. Cracking patterns could be observed because of the presence of foam, which consists of organic acids picked up by water rising in the cracks. The wheat‐cropped fallow soil had more numerous cracks than alfalfa‐cropped soil, which was attributed to its fiberous root system, which is weaker than the alfalfa taproot system. The difference in cracking patterns between the two crops has implications for water flow.