Premium
Leaching Effect on the Dissolution of Two Phosphate Rocks in Acid Soils
Author(s) -
Hanafi M. M.,
Syers J. K.,
Bolan N. S.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040052x
Subject(s) - dissolution , leaching (pedology) , soil water , chemistry , sink (geography) , environmental chemistry , phosphate , incubation , solubility , soil science , geology , biochemistry , cartography , organic chemistry , geography
Dissolution of phosphate rock (PR) in soil is a necessary prerequisite for the P in the PR to become plant available. The dissolution of two PR materials, Gafsa (GPR) and Christmas Island A (CIPR), in six acid, Malaysian soils (pH in water 3.0–5.4) was examined in closed‐incubation and open‐leaching systems. Dissolution was determined from the increase in either 0.5 M NaOH‐extractable P (ΔP) or 1 M BaCl 2 ‐triethanolamine (TEA)‐extractable Ca (ΔCa) in soil amended with PR, compared with the control soil. In the closed‐incubation system, dissolution of the reactive GPR was higher (22–71%) than that of the less reactive CIPR (26–42%). Despite an adequate supply of protons, the extent of dissolution of both PR materials was very small at 50 d, after which there was a negligible increase in the amount of P released. Calcium released from the PR materials occupied most of the negatively charged exchange sites and there was an insufficiently large Ca sink for dissolution to continue. Although the extent of PR dissolution increased with increasing P‐retention capacity of the soil, in the closed‐incubation system the size of the sink for Ca determines the extent of PR dissolution in these high P‐sorbing soils. With one exception, the dissolution of both PR materials was larger (56–94%) in the open‐leaching system and there was less difference in the extent of dissolution between the two PR materials and among the various soils. Continuous leaching resulted in the removal of cations (between 4.2 and 29.9 mmol c kg −1 soil), thus providing new sites for the Ca released from PR. The renewal of the Ca sink during leaching was the main reason for the continued dissolution of PR under leaching conditions. Studies of PR dissolution in soils using a closed‐incubation system provide information that is less relevant to the field situation than do related studies involving an open‐leaching system.