z-logo
Premium
Modeling Tree Growth Sensitivity to Soil Sodicity with Spatially Correlated Observations
Author(s) -
Samra J. S.,
Stahel W. A.,
Künsch H.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
soil science society of america journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.836
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1435-0661
pISSN - 0361-5995
DOI - 10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030038x
Subject(s) - sodium adsorption ratio , mathematics , statistics , soil science , loam , covariate , tree (set theory) , soil water , environmental science , agronomy , irrigation , biology , mathematical analysis , drip irrigation
Revegetation of degraded sites with an ecologically suitable tree species is an important environmental concern. Adequate evaluation of the salt tolerance of deep‐rooted perennials using pot or small‐plot culture investigations is often difficult. The natural soil heterogeneity found in field experiments provided a means to study the dependence of tree growth on soil variables such as sodicity. In such studies, the random errors of a regression model will usually show spatial correlations, and adjustments of statistical methods are, therefore, necessary. Tree height monitored for 3 yr was related to the root‐zone soil sodicity that was measured in four layers of a fine loamy Natric Haplustalf using a depth increment of 0.3 m. Sodium adsorption ratio was a better predictor of tree height variation than pH and DTPA‐extractable Na. Inclusion of DTPA‐P and ‐K in the regression model did not add to the information. The predictive power of the 0‐ to 0.6‐m layer alone was as good as that of all the four depths (up to 1.2 m) considered simultaneously. Neighboring residuals of ordinary regression of height on soil properties were correlated. Generalized least squares returned narrower confidence intervals of the sensitivity curves than corrected ordinary least squares. Consideration of pH as covariate to the log of the sodium adsorption ratio reduced confidence bands by 5 to 10%, which was roughly equivalent to 10 to 20% more observations.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here